.jpg "Sixteen competitors vied for a whole week, with one designated Lord of the Mount (Ruler of the Slope for female candidates), who remained at a round platform at stage-left. The other fifteen candidates, numbered 1 through 15, were situated in three-layered cheap seats. Each one had an uncommon wallet holding a conundrum and a differing money measure or the Jackpot Puzzle.")
Sixteen competitors vied for a whole week, with one designated Lord of the Mount (Ruler of the Slope for female candidates), who remained at a round platform at stage-left. The other fifteen candidates, numbered 1 through 15, were situated in three-layered cheap seats. Each one had an uncommon wallet holding a conundrum and a differing money measure or the Jackpot Puzzle. The Lord of the Mount chose a number and the competitor with that number asked an enigma to this player. In the event that addressed effectively, the Ruler of the Mound kept picking numbers; if addressed mistakenly, the two candidates exchanged spots, with the hopeful who confused him/her turning into the new Lord Of The Slope.The worth of the conundrum expanded the quality of the Jackpot. In the event that the Lord chose the competitor holding the Jackpot Conundrum (one for every amusement) and addressed it accurately, those two challengers part the Jackpot. Contingent upon the guidelines or the circumstances, the Lord could ask the Jackpot Puzzle holder to be situated and proceed with the diversion, maybe with different rewards or the Super Jackpot as a primary concern.
.jpg "Sixteen competitors vied for a whole week, with one designated Lord of the Mount (Ruler of the Slope for female candidates), who remained at a round platform at stage-left. The other fifteen candidates, numbered 1 through 15, were situated in three-layered cheap seats. Each one had an uncommon wallet holding a conundrum and a differing money measure or the Jackpot Puzzle.")
Assuming that the last three digits of the Jackpot sum matched a preselected target number, the Ruler may have an opportunity to win a "Super Jackpot" by rightly fathoming a Super Jackpot Question, asked by the host. It is possible that the Lord or the seat competitor who posed the question that carried the Jackpot measure to the target number could react; if either addressed effectively, both part the Super Jackpot. Sometimes, the host might tell the Lord if there was a conundrum which might permit the preselected target number to be matched.The biggest Super Jackpot won in the configuration's history was $38,750,[citation needed] part between two players on January 3, 1975; a radio meeting with Geoff Edwards for Web journal Talk Radio guaranteed that there was a NBC scene with a $50,000 win, however this has never been demonstrated.
